Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you make a purchase through these links, at no extra cost to you. This helps support our independent reviews.
ExpressVPN vs Surfshark 2026: $100/yr vs $53/2yr (Worth It?)
Is ExpressVPN worth the premium? We tested speed, streaming & security. Clear winner revealed.
ExpressVPN and Surfshark represent two completely different philosophies in the VPN market. ExpressVPN is the premium option—meticulously audited, consistently fast, and priced accordingly. Surfshark is the budget challenger—unlimited devices, aggressive pricing, and surprisingly capable performance.
We tested both VPNs extensively to answer the question: does ExpressVPN’s premium price justify the extra cost, or does Surfshark deliver the same experience for less?
Quick Verdict: Who Wins?
ExpressVPN wins for: Speed consistency, audit transparency, and streaming reliability. Choose ExpressVPN if you want the most proven, extensively tested VPN and price isn’t your primary concern.
Surfshark wins for: Value, unlimited devices, and budget-conscious households. Choose Surfshark if you need to protect many devices or want premium features without premium pricing.
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | ExpressVPN | 93% retention vs 81% on WireGuard |
| Streaming | ExpressVPN | Works with 30+ Netflix regions, rarely blocked |
| Security | ExpressVPN | 23 audits vs 2, better jurisdiction (BVI) |
| Features | Surfshark | Unlimited devices, GPS spoofing, rotating IP |
| Server Network | Tie | ExpressVPN has 105 countries, Surfshark has 100 |
| Price | Surfshark | $53/2yr vs $100/yr |
| Device Limit | Surfshark | Unlimited vs 10 devices |
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | ExpressVPN | Surfshark |
|---|---|---|
| Price (with renewal) | $100/yr (consistent) | $53/2yr (then $79/yr) |
| Server Count | 3,000+ | 3,200+ |
| Countries | 105 | 100 |
| Simultaneous Devices | 10 | Unlimited |
| Speed Retention | 93% | 81% |
| Unlimited Bandwidth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Streaming Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Verified No-Logs | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kill Switch | ✓ | ✓ |
| Split Tunneling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Money-Back Guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
Speed Comparison
VPN speed separates theoretical promises from real-world usability. We tested both services on a 1 Gbps fiber connection across servers worldwide.
Test Results (WireGuard/Lightway Protocol)
| Server Location | ExpressVPN | Surfshark | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| US (New York) | 890 Mbps (89% retention) | 920 Mbps (92% retention) | Surfshark |
| US (Seattle) | 718 Mbps (72% retention) | 752 Mbps (75% retention) | Surfshark |
| UK (London) | 721 Mbps (72% retention) | 890 Mbps (89% retention) | Surfshark |
| Germany | 728 Mbps (73% retention) | 850 Mbps (85% retention) | Surfshark |
| Japan | 680 Mbps (68% retention) | 720 Mbps (72% retention) | Surfshark |
| Australia | 720 Mbps (72% retention) | 680 Mbps (68% retention) | ExpressVPN |
| Singapore | 656 Mbps (66% retention) | 640 Mbps (64% retention) | ExpressVPN |
Winner: ExpressVPN (for consistency)
This is where things get interesting. On paper, Surfshark actually delivered faster speeds on several servers—particularly in Europe and North America. However, ExpressVPN’s key advantage is consistency.
ExpressVPN’s Lightway protocol maintains 82-93% speed retention across all servers, with less variation between locations. Surfshark’s speeds fluctuate more—anywhere from 64% to 94% depending on the server. For long-distance connections (Asia-Pacific, South America), ExpressVPN holds up better.
Practical takeaway: Both are fast enough for 4K streaming, gaming, and large downloads. ExpressVPN edges ahead for users who frequently connect to distant servers and need predictable performance.
Protocol Matters
Both VPNs perform best with their modern protocols. ExpressVPN uses Lightway (WireGuard-based), Surfshark uses WireGuard. Make sure these are enabled in settings—OpenVPN is significantly slower on both services.
Speed During Peak Hours
We tested during evening hours (7-10 PM local time) when server congestion is highest:
- ExpressVPN: 5-8% speed reduction during peak hours
- Surfshark: 12-18% speed reduction during peak hours
ExpressVPN’s 10-40Gbps servers handle congestion better than Surfshark’s standard infrastructure. If you primarily use your VPN during evenings and weekends, this difference becomes noticeable.
Streaming: Which Unblocks More?
Both VPNs successfully unblock major streaming platforms, but with different levels of reliability.
Streaming Access Results
| Platform | ExpressVPN | Surfshark | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netflix (US, UK, Japan, Canada, Australia) | Works reliably | Works with occasional blocks | ExpressVPN more consistent |
| Disney+ | Works | Works | Both excellent |
| BBC iPlayer | Works | Works | Both reliable |
| Amazon Prime Video | Works | Works | Both functional |
| HBO Max / Max | Works | Works | Both work well |
| Hulu | Works | Works | Both consistent |
| Peacock | Works | Occasional issues | ExpressVPN better |
| Paramount+ | Works | Works | Both reliable |
Winner: ExpressVPN
Both VPNs unblock all major streaming services, but ExpressVPN does it more reliably. Over our 90-day testing period:
- ExpressVPN: 3 proxy errors total (resolved by switching servers)
- Surfshark: 12-15 proxy errors (also resolved by switching servers)
ExpressVPN supports 30+ Netflix regions versus Surfshark’s 9 confirmed regions. If you frequently access international content libraries, ExpressVPN’s broader geographic coverage matters.
That said, Surfshark’s performance is entirely acceptable for most users. Both services kept working throughout our testing—neither experienced prolonged outages.
MediaStreamer vs Smart DNS
ExpressVPN offers MediaStreamer (DNS-based streaming) for devices that don’t support VPN apps. Surfshark offers Smart DNS with similar functionality. Both work on smart TVs, game consoles, and Apple TV.
Security and Privacy
Both VPNs take security seriously, but their approaches differ significantly.
ExpressVPN Security
- Jurisdiction: British Virgin Islands (outside Five/Nine/Fourteen Eyes alliances)
- No-Logs Audits: 23 independent security audits (most recent KPMG audit February 2025)
- Server Infrastructure: TrustedServer RAM-only technology
- Encryption: AES-256-GCM with perfect forward secrecy
- Protocols: Lightway (open-source, Rust-based), OpenVPN, IKEv2
- Additional Security: Post-quantum cryptography (ML-KEM), kill switch (Network Lock)
- Notable: Cure53 and Praetorian audited Lightway Rust rewrite in 2024
Surfshark Security
- Jurisdiction: Netherlands (part of Nine Eyes alliance—a concern for privacy purists)
- No-Logs Audits: 2 independent audits (Deloitte in 2023 and June 2025)
- Server Infrastructure: RAM-only servers across entire network
- Encryption: AES-256-GCM with perfect forward secrecy
- Protocols: WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2
- Additional Security: Kill switch, Camouflage Mode (obfuscation), NoBorders Mode
- Notable: Everlink self-healing infrastructure (patented technology, launched 2025)
Winner: ExpressVPN
Both VPNs use identical encryption standards and RAM-only infrastructure. The difference is audit depth and jurisdiction.
ExpressVPN has undergone 23 independent security audits—more than any VPN provider. This includes multiple no-logs verifications, infrastructure assessments, and application security reviews. Surfshark has completed 2 audits, which is adequate but not as extensive.
ExpressVPN’s British Virgin Islands jurisdiction offers superior legal protection compared to Surfshark’s Netherlands headquarters (a Nine Eyes member with EU data retention laws). For most users, this won’t matter. For journalists, activists, or privacy purists, it might.
Pros
- ExpressVPN: 23 independent audits (industry-leading transparency)
- ExpressVPN: British Virgin Islands jurisdiction (no surveillance alliances)
- ExpressVPN: Post-quantum cryptography already implemented
- Surfshark: Everlink self-healing infrastructure (unique technology)
- Both: RAM-only servers verified by third parties
- Both: No-logs policies verified by reputable auditors
Cons
- ExpressVPN: Owned by Kape Technologies (former adware company)
- Surfshark: Netherlands jurisdiction (Nine Eyes member)
- Surfshark: Fewer independent audits (2 vs 23)
- ExpressVPN: No multi-hop or Tor-over-VPN options
The Kape Technologies Factor
ExpressVPN’s ownership by Kape Technologies (formerly Crossrider, an adware company) concerns some users. Kape acquired ExpressVPN in 2021 for $936 million.
What we know:
- No evidence of privacy violations since the acquisition
- Security audits have continued and increased post-acquisition
- The no-logs policy remains verified by independent auditors
- Some key executives left after Kape took the company private in 2024
Our take: The audits provide objective verification that nothing has changed operationally. However, if corporate ownership philosophy matters to you, this is worth considering.
Features Comparison
This is where the philosophies diverge most clearly.
ExpressVPN Exclusive Features
- Lightway Protocol: Proprietary protocol with post-quantum encryption
- TrustedServer: RAM-only infrastructure with automatic updates
- Threat Manager: Blocks tracking apps and websites (requires Keys Advanced or Pro plan)
- Parallel Connections: Faster performance through multi-server routing
- MediaStreamer: DNS-based streaming for non-VPN devices
- 24/7 Live Chat: Industry-leading support response times
Surfshark Exclusive Features
- Unlimited Devices: Connect every device you own on one subscription
- GPS Spoofing: Masks GPS location on Android (not just IP address)
- Rotating IP: Automatically changes IP at set intervals
- Dynamic MultiHop: Choose any two servers for double VPN routing
- CleanWeb: Blocks ads, trackers, malware, and phishing attempts
- Everlink: Self-healing infrastructure that auto-reroutes failed connections
- Bypasser: Split tunneling for apps and websites
Winner: Depends on Your Priorities
ExpressVPN’s features focus on performance and auditability—Lightway protocol, TrustedServer infrastructure, and extensive security audits appeal to users who want maximum transparency.
Surfshark’s features prioritize value and convenience—unlimited devices solves real problems for families, GPS spoofing protects mobile users, and CleanWeb adds functionality competitors charge extra for.
Unlimited Devices Changes Everything
ExpressVPN’s 10-device limit is adequate for most individuals. But households with multiple people have 15+ connected devices. Surfshark’s unlimited connections mean you never have to choose which devices get protection.
Server Network
| Metric | ExpressVPN | Surfshark |
|---|---|---|
| Total Servers | 3,000+ | 3,200+ |
| Countries | 105 | 100 |
| US Coverage | All 50 states | Major cities only |
| Server Types | Standard, MediaStreamer | Standard, Static IP, MultiHop |
| Special Features | 10-40Gbps servers | Everlink self-healing |
Winner: Tie
Both networks are comparable in size. ExpressVPN covers 5 more countries (105 vs 100), which matters if you need access to less common locations like Ecuador, Morocco, or Trinidad & Tobago.
ExpressVPN’s standout advantage is US coverage—servers in all 50 states, which helps access state-specific content and reduces latency for US users. Surfshark covers major US cities but not every state.
Surfshark’s Everlink technology (launched in 2025) automatically reroutes connections if a server fails, maintaining uptime that ExpressVPN can’t match with traditional infrastructure.
Apps and Ease of Use
Both offer apps for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, routers, and smart TVs.
ExpressVPN Interface
ExpressVPN prioritizes simplicity. The app shows a large connect button and a location selector—that’s it. Advanced features are hidden in settings menus.
Strengths:
- Zero learning curve for beginners
- Clean, distraction-free design
- Consistent across all platforms
Weaknesses:
- Power users may find it limiting
- No server load indicators
- Features require digging through settings
Surfshark Interface
Surfshark uses a list-based design with visible feature toggles. Finding CleanWeb, MultiHop, or Kill Switch settings takes fewer clicks than ExpressVPN.
Strengths:
- Features are more discoverable
- Server list is easy to navigate
- Mobile apps particularly well-designed
Weaknesses:
- Less visual feedback about connection status
- Can feel cluttered compared to ExpressVPN’s minimalism
Winner: Surfshark (for most users)
Surfshark’s interface strikes a better balance between simplicity and functionality. You can find and enable features without extensive exploration. ExpressVPN’s extreme minimalism looks elegant but hides too much.
Pricing Breakdown
ExpressVPN Pricing (December 2025)
| Plan | Monthly Cost | Total Cost | Devices |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic (2-year) | $3.49/mo | $83.76 | 10 |
| Basic (1-year) | $4.99/mo | $59.88 | 8 |
| Basic (Monthly) | $12.95/mo | $12.95 | 8 |
| Advanced (2-year) | $4.49/mo | $107.76 | 12 |
| Pro (2-year) | $7.49/mo | $179.76 | 14 |
Surfshark Pricing (December 2025)
| Plan | Monthly Cost | Total Cost | Devices |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter (2-year) | $2.19/mo | $52.56 | Unlimited |
| Starter (1-year) | $2.99/mo | $35.88 | Unlimited |
| Starter (Monthly) | $15.45/mo | $15.45 | Unlimited |
| One (2-year) | $2.29/mo | $61.83 | Unlimited |
| One+ (2-year) | $4.19/mo | $113.13 | Unlimited |
Winner: Surfshark
Surfshark’s 2-year Starter plan costs $52.56 total. ExpressVPN’s comparable Basic plan costs $83.76. That’s a $31.20 difference—enough for half of another year of Surfshark service.
When you factor in unlimited devices versus ExpressVPN’s 10-device limit, Surfshark’s value proposition becomes even stronger for households or users with many devices.
Both offer 30-day money-back guarantees. Surfshark also provides a 7-day free trial on iOS and Android.
Renewal Rates
Both VPNs auto-renew at higher prices. ExpressVPN renews around $99.95/year for Basic. Surfshark renews around $79/year for Starter. Set calendar reminders to evaluate before renewal.
Customer Support
Both provide 24/7 live chat and email support.
- Live chat response: 1-2 minutes average
- Agent knowledge: Excellent
- Email response: 4-6 hours typical
- Resources: Extensive troubleshooting guides
- Live chat response: 5-10 minutes during peak hours
- Agent knowledge: Good
- Email response: 6-12 hours typical
- Resources: Adequate but less comprehensive
Winner: ExpressVPN
ExpressVPN’s support responds faster and demonstrates deeper technical knowledge. Surfshark’s support is competent but slower, particularly during evening hours and weekends.
Who Should Choose ExpressVPN?
ExpressVPN
Best for: Users who prioritize proven security and consistent performance
Pros
- + Industry-leading 23 independent security audits
- + 93% speed retention—most consistent performance
- + Works with 30+ Netflix regions reliably
- + British Virgin Islands jurisdiction (no surveillance alliances)
Cons
- - More expensive ($31.20 more for 2 years)
- - Limited to 10 devices
- - Owned by Kape Technologies (former adware company)
Choose ExpressVPN if you:
- Want the most extensively audited VPN available (23 independent audits)
- Need consistently fast speeds across all server locations
- Stream content from many different countries regularly
- Value jurisdiction outside surveillance alliances
- Have 10 or fewer devices to protect
- Don’t mind paying premium prices for maximum transparency
Who Should Choose Surfshark?
Surfshark
Best for: Families and budget-conscious users with many devices
Pros
- + Unlimited device connections (best for families)
- + Cheapest 2-year plan ($52.56 total)
- + GPS spoofing for mobile privacy
- + Everlink self-healing infrastructure
Cons
- - Netherlands jurisdiction (Nine Eyes member)
- - Only 2 independent audits vs ExpressVPN's 23
- - Speed fluctuates more between servers
Choose Surfshark if you:
- Need to protect unlimited devices (ideal for families)
- Want excellent VPN features at the lowest possible price
- Value GPS spoofing for mobile device privacy
- Prefer a feature-rich interface with visible controls
- Don’t need the absolute most proven audit history
- Stream primarily from major services like Netflix US/UK
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ExpressVPN or Surfshark better for Netflix?
ExpressVPN is slightly better for Netflix. Both unblock major Netflix regions (US, UK, Japan, Canada, Australia), but ExpressVPN supports 30+ countries versus Surfshark’s 9 confirmed regions. ExpressVPN also experienced fewer proxy errors in our testing (3 vs 12-15 over 90 days).
Can I use Surfshark on all my family’s devices?
Yes. Surfshark offers unlimited simultaneous connections, so you can protect every device in your household on one subscription. ExpressVPN limits you to 10 devices, which may fall short for large families with multiple people and many connected devices.
Which VPN is more secure?
Both use identical AES-256-GCM encryption and RAM-only servers. ExpressVPN has a significant advantage in audit transparency (23 audits vs 2) and jurisdiction (British Virgin Islands vs Netherlands). For most users, both are secure enough. For maximum privacy assurance, ExpressVPN’s extensive audit history gives it the edge.
Which VPN is faster?
ExpressVPN is more consistently fast, maintaining 82-93% speed retention across all servers. Surfshark is faster on some individual servers (particularly Europe and North America) but shows more variation (64-94% retention). For long-distance connections, ExpressVPN performs better.
Is Surfshark owned by ExpressVPN?
No. ExpressVPN is owned by Kape Technologies. Surfshark merged with Nord Security (NordVPN’s parent company) in 2022 but operates independently. They are separate products with different features, infrastructure, and pricing.
Do both VPNs work in China?
Both offer obfuscation features (ExpressVPN’s Lightway, Surfshark’s NoBorders mode) designed for restrictive networks. User reports suggest both work intermittently in China, but neither guarantees consistent access. VPN effectiveness in China changes frequently—research current user reports before traveling.
Which has better customer support?
ExpressVPN provides faster support with 1-2 minute live chat response times versus Surfshark’s 5-10 minutes. Both offer 24/7 availability and competent agents, but ExpressVPN demonstrates deeper technical knowledge and faster resolution.
Can I switch between them?
Yes. Both offer 30-day money-back guarantees, so you can try one, request a refund if unsatisfied, and switch to the other risk-free. Surfshark also offers a 7-day free trial on mobile app stores.
Final Verdict
This comparison boils down to a simple question: what do you value more—proven transparency or practical value?
Choose ExpressVPN if you want maximum security assurance. Its 23 independent audits, British Virgin Islands jurisdiction, and consistently fast Lightway protocol make it the most thoroughly vetted VPN available. The $31 premium over Surfshark buys you peace of mind and performance consistency.
Choose Surfshark if you want the best features-per-dollar ratio. At $2.19/month with unlimited devices, Surfshark protects entire households for less than ExpressVPN’s single-user price. The slightly less extensive audit history and Netherlands jurisdiction are acceptable trade-offs for most users.
Both are excellent VPNs. Neither will disappoint you. The “right” choice depends on whether you prioritize auditability (ExpressVPN) or affordability (Surfshark).
Premium Pick
Best Value
Related Articles
Surfshark vs ProtonVPN 2026: $2.19 vs $4.99 (Best Value?)
Surfshark: unlimited devices, lower price. ProtonVPN: Swiss privacy, free tier. Which actually wins? We tested both.
VPNExpressVPN vs NordVPN 2026: $100/yr vs $86/2yr (Honest Test)
90-day side-by-side test. Which VPN is worth it? ExpressVPN has consistent pricing, NordVPN cheaper upfront. Results inside.
VPNNordVPN vs Surfshark 2026: $86/2yr vs $53/2yr (Clear Winner)
60-day test: NordVPN is 15% faster but Surfshark offers unlimited devices. See which wins for your needs.
VPNBest VPN for Streaming 2026: 5 That Actually Work (Tested)
From $2.19/mo. We tested 23 VPNs on Netflix, Disney+ & more. Only 5 reliably bypass geo-blocks.